-> make sure the settings change is rejected or the settings task fails when the specified model doesn't support
overriding `dimensions` and the passed `dimensions` differs from the model's default dimensions.
4238: Task queue webhook r=dureuill a=irevoire
# Prototype `prototype-task-queue-webhook-1`
The prototype is available through Docker by using the following command:
```bash
docker run -p 7700:7700 -v $(pwd)/meili_data:/meili_data getmeili/meilisearch:prototype-task-queue-webhook-1
```
# Pull Request
Implements the task queue webhook.
## Related issue
Fixes https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/4236
## What does this PR do?
- Provide a new cli and env var for the webhook, respectively called `--task-webhook-url` and `MEILI_TASK_WEBHOOK_URL`
- Also supports sending the requests with a custom `Authorization` header by specifying the optional `--task-webhook-authorization-header` CLI parameter or `MEILI_TASK_WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION_HEADER` env variable.
- Throw an error if the specified URL is invalid
- Every time a batch is processed, send all the finished tasks into the webhook with our public `TaskView` type as a JSON Line GZIPed body.
- Add one test.
## PR checklist
### Before becoming ready to review
- [x] Add a test
- [x] Compress the data we send
- [x] Chunk and stream the data we send
- [x] Remove the unwrap in the index-scheduler when sending the data fails
- [x] The analytics are missing
### Before merging
- [x] Release a prototype
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Clément Renault <clement@meilisearch.com>
3990: Removed unnecessary borrow call that failed nightly tests r=irevoire a=JannisK89
# Pull Request
## Related issue
Fixes#3988
## What does this PR do?
- Removes unnecessary borrow call that was causing warnings when running tests on nightly.
## PR checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
- [ x] Does this PR fix an existing issue, or have you listed the changes applied in the PR description (and why they are needed)?
- [ x] Have you read the contributing guidelines?
- [ x] Have you made sure that the title is accurate and descriptive of the changes?
Thank you so much for contributing to Meilisearch!
Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to improve this PR.
Thank you.
Co-authored-by: JannisK89 <jannis.karanikis@gmail.com>
3834: Define searchable fields at runtime r=Kerollmops a=ManyTheFish
## Summary
This feature allows the end-user to search in one or multiple attributes using the search parameter `attributesToSearchOn`:
```json
{
"q": "Captain Marvel",
"attributesToSearchOn": ["title"]
}
```
This feature act like a filter, forcing Meilisearch to only return the documents containing the requested words in the attributes-to-search-on. Note that, with the matching strategy `last`, Meilisearch will only ensure that the first word is in the attributes-to-search-on, but, the retrieved documents will be ordered taking into account the word contained in the attributes-to-search-on.
## Trying the prototype
A dedicated docker image has been released for this feature:
#### last prototype version:
```bash
docker pull getmeili/meilisearch:prototype-define-searchable-fields-at-search-time-1
```
#### others prototype versions:
```bash
docker pull getmeili/meilisearch:prototype-define-searchable-fields-at-search-time-0
```
## Technical Detail
The attributes-to-search-on list is given to the search context, then, the search context uses the `fid_word_docids`database using only the allowed field ids instead of the global `word_docids` database. This is the same for the prefix databases.
The database cache is updated with the merged values, meaning that the union of the field-id-database values is only made if the requested key is missing from the cache.
### Relevancy limits
Almost all ranking rules behave as expected when ordering the documents.
Only `proximity` could miss-order documents if all the searched words are in the restricted attribute but a better proximity is found in an ignored attribute in a document that should be ranked lower. I put below a failing test showing it:
```rust
#[actix_rt::test]
async fn proximity_ranking_rule_order() {
let server = Server::new().await;
let index = index_with_documents(
&server,
&json!([
{
"title": "Captain super mega cool. A Marvel story",
// Perfect distance between words in an ignored attribute
"desc": "Captain Marvel",
"id": "1",
},
{
"title": "Captain America from Marvel",
"desc": "a Shazam ersatz",
"id": "2",
}]),
)
.await;
// Document 2 should appear before document 1.
index
.search(json!({"q": "Captain Marvel", "attributesToSearchOn": ["title"], "attributesToRetrieve": ["id"]}), |response, code| {
assert_eq!(code, 200, "{}", response);
assert_eq!(
response["hits"],
json!([
{"id": "2"},
{"id": "1"},
])
);
})
.await;
}
```
Fixing this would force us to create a `fid_word_pair_proximity_docids` and a `fid_word_prefix_pair_proximity_docids` databases which may multiply the keys of `word_pair_proximity_docids` and `word_prefix_pair_proximity_docids` by the number of attributes in the searchable_attributes list. If we think we should fix this test, I'll suggest doing it in another PR.
## Related
Fixes#3772
Co-authored-by: Tamo <tamo@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: ManyTheFish <many@meilisearch.com>
