snowykami/meilisearch
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch.git synced 2024-11-26 20:15:07 +08:00
Code Issues Actions 4 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Don't run block code in doc tests of word_pair_proximity_docids

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Loïc Lecrenier 2022-07-19 08:52:01 +02:00
parent f6f8f543e1
commit 7309111433
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
milli/src/update/word_prefix_pair_proximity_docids.rs
View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ different words in the documents.
To compute it, we have access to (mainly) two inputs:
* a list of sorted prefixes, such as:
```
```text
c
ca
cat
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ different words from the database are included in this list.
* a sorted list of word pairs and the distance between them (i.e. proximity),
* associated with a roaring bitmap, such as:
```
```text
good dog 3 -> docids1: [2, 5, 6]
good doggo 1 -> docids2: [8]
good dogma 1 -> docids3: [7, 19, 20]
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ I illustrate a simplified version of the algorithm to create the word-prefix
pair-proximity database below:
1. **Outer loop:** First, we iterate over each word pair and its proximity:
```
```text
word1 : good
word2 : dog
proximity: 3
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ proximity: 3
in the list of sorted prefixes. And we insert the key (`prefix`, `proximity`)
and the value (`docids`) to a sorted map which we call the “batch”. For example,
at the end of the first inner loop, we may have:
```
```text
Outer loop 1:
------------------------------
word1 : good
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ batch: [
]
```
3. For illustration purpose, let's run through a second iteration of the outer loop:
```
```text
Outer loop 2:
------------------------------
word1 : good
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ of the elements inserted in the second iteration of the outer loop appear
*before* elements from the first iteration.
4. And a third:
```
```text
Outer loop 3:
------------------------------
word1 : good
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Notice that there were some conflicts which were resolved by merging the
conflicting values together.
5. On the fourth iteration of the outer loop, we have:
```
```text
Outer loop 4:
------------------------------
word1 : good
@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ is different than the previous `word1`.
6. **Flushing the batch:** to flush the batch, we look at the `word1` and
iterate over the elements of the batch in sorted order:
```
```text
Flushing Batch loop 1:
------------------------------
word1 : good