mirror of
https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch.git
synced 2024-11-26 20:15:07 +08:00
doc: Add some wrk stats to the Readme
This commit is contained in:
parent
446d6a5455
commit
05fd7e87ec
20
README.md
20
README.md
@ -22,15 +22,21 @@ MeiliDB will be a binary in a near future so you will be able to use it as a dat
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Performances
|
## Performances
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
_These information are outdated (October 2018) and will be updated soon_
|
With a database composed of _100 353_ documents with _352_ attributes each and _90_ of them indexed.
|
||||||
|
So nearly _9 million_ fields indexed for _35 million_ stored we can handle more than _1.2k req/sec_ on an Intel i7-7700 (8) @ 4.2GHz.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We made some tests on remote machines and found that MeiliDB easily handles a dataset of near 280k products, on a $5/month server with a single vCPU and 1GB of RAM, running the same index, with a simple query:
|
Requests are made using [wrk](https://github.com/wg/wrk) and scripted to generate real users queries.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- near 190 concurrent users with an average response time of 90ms
|
```
|
||||||
- 150 concurrent users with an average response time of 70ms
|
Running 10s test @ http://localhost:2230
|
||||||
- 100 concurrent users with an average response time of 45ms
|
2 threads and 12 connections
|
||||||
|
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
|
||||||
Servers were located in Amsterdam and tests were made between two different locations.
|
Latency 18.86ms 49.39ms 614.89ms 95.23%
|
||||||
|
Req/Sec 620.41 59.53 790.00 65.00%
|
||||||
|
12359 requests in 10.00s, 3.26MB read
|
||||||
|
Requests/sec: 1235.54
|
||||||
|
Transfer/sec: 334.22KB
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Notes
|
### Notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user